Psychological Motivations for Idol Worship and Their Perceived Impact Among Chinese University Students¶
Wen Zhenyang
Abstract¶
Fan culture has evolved from a niche subculture into a pervasive social force in China, yet the psychological motivations underlying idol worship among university students and their relationship to perceived impact remain insufficiently understood. This study investigates three interconnected research questions: (1) What are the dominant psychological motivations driving idol worship among Chinese university students? (2) How do different motivations relate to students' perceived impact of idol worship on their personal lives? (3) How do students with different worship motivations perceive fan culture conflicts' effect on the online environment? An online survey was administered to 193 Chinese university students (45.6% male, 54.4% female), of whom 129 reported having an idol. The survey measured idol type, worship intensity, psychological motivations, fan circle participation, perceived personal impact, and perceived impact on the online environment. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that cognitive-aspirational motivations—particularly talent recognition (89.92%) and personality/values identification (82.95%)—dominated overwhelmingly, while emotional-attachment motives such as escapism (9.30%) and social-belonging needs (11.63%) were comparatively minor. Most respondents perceived idol worship as personally positive (42.64%) or neutral (48.06%), with only 5.43% reporting negative impact. However, a striking private–public paradox emerged: over 70% of idol-worshipping respondents evaluated fan culture conflicts as damaging to the online environment. These findings suggest that individual idol worship, driven primarily by aspirational identification, functions as a largely benign or beneficial personal experience, while the genuine risks arise from the organized, collective dynamics of fan culture. This study contributes to the literature by centering motivation as a primary variable and linking distinct motivational profiles to differential perceived outcomes at both personal and social levels.
Keywords: idol worship, celebrity worship, psychological motivation, fan culture, Chinese university students, parasocial interaction, perceived impact
1. Introduction¶
Fan culture in China has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past three decades, evolving from a niche subculture into a pervasive social force that shapes public discourse, commercial markets, and the daily lives of millions of young people (Zhang, 2024). Chinese fan communities now constitute a significant proportion of internet users, and the activities of organized fan circles—ranging from chart-ranking campaigns and coordinated purchasing to large-scale online conflicts—have generated intense public debate and drawn regulatory attention from state authorities (Mao et al., 2023; Wang & Ge, 2023). University students, who are at a critical stage of identity formation and value development, represent a particularly significant population within this landscape. Understanding why they engage in idol worship and how they perceive its effects is therefore both an academic and a social priority.
Despite growing scholarly attention to celebrity worship, existing research has predominantly focused on the relationship between worship intensity and psychological outcomes, treating motivation as an implicit rather than a central variable (Brooks, 2021). The dominant paradigm, exemplified by McCutcheon et al.'s (2002) absorption-addiction model and Celebrity Worship Scale, conceptualizes worship along a continuum from entertainment-social engagement to borderline-pathological attachment, with the primary research question being whether and how worship harms mental health (Maltby et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2026). While this body of work has generated valuable insights, it leaves a critical gap: we know relatively little about how different psychological motivations for idol worship—such as cognitive admiration, emotional attachment, aesthetic attraction, or social belonging—differentially relate to students' own perceptions of worship's impact on their personal lives and on the broader online environment.
This gap is particularly significant in the Chinese context, where fan culture operates within a unique sociocultural ecosystem characterized by platform-mediated mobilization, commercial logic, and entanglements with state power (Zhang, 2024; Wang & Ge, 2023). Recent scholarship has begun to reveal the complexity of Chinese fan engagement. Wei and Huang (2024) identified six distinct fan profiles among Chinese emerging adults, demonstrating that a simple healthy-to-pathological continuum oversimplifies the phenomenon. Yet even these more nuanced typologies have not systematically examined how motivational differences shape perceived outcomes.
The present study addresses this gap by investigating the following three interconnected research questions:
RQ1: What are the dominant psychological motivations driving idol worship among Chinese university students?
RQ2: How do different motivations relate to students' perceived impact of idol worship on their personal lives?
RQ3: How do students with different worship motivations perceive fan culture conflicts' effect on the online environment?
These three questions form a logical chain: identifying the motivational landscape, then linking motivations to perceived personal impact, and finally to perceived social impact. By centering motivation as the primary analytical variable and connecting it to both personal and collective dimensions of perceived impact, this study aims to move beyond broad descriptions of celebrity worship and contribute a more differentiated understanding of how and why idol worship matters to those who practice it.
2. Literature Review¶
Fan culture has evolved from a niche subculture into a pervasive social force, particularly in China, where fan communities constitute a significant part of internet users and have generated intense public debate (Zhang, 2024). Researchers have increasingly sought to understand why individuals form intense, one-sided attachments to media figures, and how these attachments affect their lives. This review synthesizes existing scholarship across three interconnected themes—the motivational foundations of celebrity worship, its perceived impact on personal well-being, and the sociocultural dynamics of Chinese fan culture—each informing the question of how psychological motivations shape university students' experiences of idol worship.
Motivational Foundations of Celebrity Worship¶
The theoretical foundation for understanding idol worship lies in parasocial interaction, first articulated by Horton and Wohl (1956), who described the "intimacy at a distance" that audiences develop with media personalities. Building on this, McCutcheon, Lange, and Houran (2002) proposed the absorption-addiction model and developed the Celebrity Worship Scale (CWS), identifying three progressive stages: entertainment-social, intense-personal, and borderline-pathological worship. This framework has become the dominant paradigm in celebrity worship research.
Recent scholarship has explored specific psychological drivers of worship. Attachment theory has emerged as a particularly productive lens: Gong et al. (2025) demonstrated through a four-wave longitudinal study of 662 Chinese university freshmen that insecure attachment predicted higher initial celebrity worship and slowed its natural decline during the university transition, mediated by reduced self-concept clarity. MacNeill and DiTommaso (2022) similarly reported that anxiously attached individuals tend to form stronger parasocial relationships.
Complementing this, Jia et al. (2023) found that social anxiety positively predicted celebrity worship among 1,147 Chinese university students, with mobile phone dependence as a mediator—an effect amplified among students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
Perceived Impact on Personal Well-Being¶
The relationship between celebrity worship and mental health has received considerable empirical attention. Maltby et al. (2004) established that intense-personal worship was associated with poorer mental health through neuroticism and disengagement coping. Brooks (2021) systematically reviewed 62 studies, confirming associations between celebrity worship and personality, self-esteem, and well-being, while noting that different motivational profiles remain underexplored.
More recent work has complicated this predominantly pathological picture. Wei and Huang (2024) employed latent profile analysis with 806 Chinese emerging adults and identified six distinct fan types, challenging the assumption of a simple healthy-to-pathological continuum. Zhang et al. (2026) used network analysis on 1,103 Chinese undergraduates and found that borderline-pathological worship cognition was the key bridge node connecting celebrity worship to reduced life satisfaction. However, Qu and Zhong (2025) revealed a parallel positive pathway: among 547 Chinese fans, anxious attachment indirectly predicted prosocial behavior through a chain mediation of parasocial intimacy and perceived social support. Morgan et al. (2024) further documented dual effects in qualitative research, showing that celebrity worship could both motivate personal growth and exacerbate anxiety.
Chinese Fan Culture and Sociocultural Dynamics¶
Understanding Chinese university students' idol worship requires situating individual psychology within broader sociocultural dynamics. Mao, Wang, and Chen (2023) characterized Chinese fan circles as quasi-organizational communities governed by emotional discipline and commercial logic, simultaneously celebrated for philanthropic activities and condemned for disruptive behavior. Zhang (2024) traced the 30-year evolution of China's online fandom, illustrating how platform architectures have shaped fan mobilization. Wang and Ge (2023) examined how fan communities interact with state power, revealing entanglements of fan identity, censorship sensibilities, and collective mobilization. Addressing measurement needs in the Chinese context, He and Liu (2024) developed a 36-item, nine-factor scale capturing excessive worship behaviors including social dysfunction, withdrawal, and escapism.
Conclusion and Research Gaps¶
Taken together, the literature reveals a rich but uneven landscape. While celebrity worship is well measured and its mental health correlates extensively documented, motivation has largely been treated as an implicit variable rather than a central object of inquiry. There is a scarcity of research on how distinct psychological motivations—such as attachment needs, social compensation, or aspirational identification—differentially relate to students' own perceptions of idol worship's impact on their personal lives. Furthermore, little has been done to examine how these motivational profiles shape students' perceptions of fan culture conflicts and their effect on the online environment. To date, few studies have connected individual psychological drivers to the collective dynamics of Chinese fan culture, leaving a critical gap in understanding how and why idol worship matters to those who practice it.
3. Methodology¶
3.1 Research Design¶
This study employed a cross-sectional online survey design to investigate the psychological motivations for idol worship among Chinese university students and their perceived impact at both personal and social levels. The survey instrument was designed to capture demographic information, idol worship status, motivational profiles, fan circle participation behaviors, and perceived impacts through a combination of multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and categorical items.
3.2 Participants¶
A total of 193 valid responses were collected from Chinese university students. The sample comprised 88 males (45.6%) and 105 females (54.4%). To ensure data quality, attention-check items were embedded in the questionnaire; responses failing these checks were excluded prior to analysis, which accounts for instances where the sum of response percentages in certain items falls below 100%.
Among all respondents, 56 (29.02%) reported actively worshipping and participating in fan activities, 73 (37.82%) reported having an idol but would not characterize their engagement as worship, and 64 (33.16%) reported no idol worship or fan circle involvement. Respondents who indicated having an idol (n = 129) proceeded to answer idol-specific questions regarding motivations, behaviors, and perceived impacts. The full sample (N = 193) was used for general perception questions answered by all respondents regardless of idol worship status.
3.3 Instrument¶
The survey instrument consisted of several sections designed to address the three research questions.
The first section collected demographic information including gender and idol worship status. The second section, administered to respondents with idols (n = 129), assessed idol type and information channels through multiple-choice items. Respondents could select from categories including entertainment celebrities, virtual idols, scholars and experts, sports stars, and internet celebrities, as well as information channels such as video platforms, social media, fan communities, and news websites.
The third section, core to RQ1, measured worship intensity using a self-rated 0–10 scale and assessed primary psychological motivations through a multiple-choice item with nine options. These options were inductively categorized into four motivational profiles: cognitive-aspirational (talent/ability recognition, personality/values identification, growth story/perseverance narrative, positive social influence), aesthetic attraction (appearance/image), emotional-attachment (emotional attachment/comfort, escapism), and social-belonging (social needs/connecting with others). An additional category, external influence (media or internet influence), was also included.
The fourth section assessed fan circle participation behaviors, including participation in organized activities (e.g., voting, purchasing merchandise) and involvement in idol/fan-circle conflict-related behavior, using categorical and multiple-choice items.
The fifth section, core to RQ2, measured perceived personal impact through a categorical item assessing overall perceived impact (positive, no significant impact, negative, or other) and four Likert-type items (1–5 scale) assessing specific impact dimensions including stress relief, values distortion, skill acquisition, and time displacement.
The sixth section, core to RQ3, measured perceived impact of idol/fan-circle conflicts on the online environment through separate items for idol-having respondents (n = 129) and non-idol respondents (n = 64), using a five-point categorical scale ranging from "seriously damaging" to "positive."
3.4 Data Analysis¶
Given the descriptive and exploratory nature of this study, data analysis relied primarily on descriptive statistics, including frequency distributions, percentages, and mean scores. Motivational categories were derived through inductive grouping of survey response options based on their theoretical alignment with established psychological constructs. Cross-referencing between motivational data (Q6) and perceived impact data (Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14) was conducted to examine patterns of association between motivational profiles and perceived outcomes. No inferential statistical tests were performed, as the study aimed to identify and describe motivational patterns and their perceived correlates rather than to establish causal relationships.
4. Findings¶
4.1 RQ1: Dominant Psychological Motivations¶
The self-rated worship intensity among respondents with idols (n = 129) yielded a mean score of 6.19 on a 0–10 scale, indicating a moderate level of engagement. The distribution of primary motivations for idol worship revealed a clear hierarchy of psychological drivers, which were inductively categorized into five motivational profiles.
Cognitive-aspirational motivations emerged as the dominant cluster. Talent and ability recognition was the most frequently cited motivation, selected by 116 respondents (89.92%), followed closely by personality and values identification at 107 respondents (82.95%). The idol's growth story and perseverance narrative was selected by 61 respondents (47.29%), and the idol's positive social influence by 42 respondents (32.56%). Taken together, these cognitive-aspirational items consistently ranked among the highest-endorsed motivations, indicating that admiration for an idol's competence, character, and inspiring life trajectory constitutes the primary psychological driver of worship among Chinese university students.
Aesthetic attraction, measured by the appearance/image item, was a strong secondary factor, selected by 90 respondents (69.77%). This finding indicates that while visual appeal plays a substantial role, it is secondary to cognitive and aspirational considerations.
Emotional-attachment motivations were moderately prevalent. Emotional attachment and comfort were selected by 52 respondents (40.31%), while escapism was endorsed by only 12 respondents (9.30%). This pattern suggests that while a meaningful minority of students derive emotional sustenance from idol worship, the majority do not characterize their engagement in terms of emotional dependence or reality avoidance.
Social-belonging motivations, represented by social needs and connecting with others, were selected by only 15 respondents (11.63%), indicating that interpersonal and communal motivations are relatively minor drivers of idol worship in this sample.
External influence, represented by media or internet influence, was cited by 17 respondents (13.18%), suggesting that most students perceive their worship as internally motivated rather than externally imposed.
Regarding idol types, entertainment celebrities (singers, actors) were the most common, selected by 81 respondents (62.79%), followed by virtual idols (27.13%), scholars and experts (24.03%), sports stars (22.48%), and internet celebrities (13.18%). Video platforms (79.07%) and social media (76.74%) were the dominant information channels, with fan communities (30.23%) and news websites (18.60%) playing secondary roles.
4.2 RQ2: Perceived Personal Impact¶
The overall perceived impact of idol worship on university life among respondents with idols (n = 129) was predominantly positive or neutral. A total of 55 respondents (42.64%) reported a positive impact, 62 (48.06%) reported no significant impact, and only 7 (5.43%) perceived a negative impact. An additional 5 respondents (3.88%) described unique personal experiences that did not fit neatly into these categories.
The Likert-type items (1–5 scale) measuring specific impact dimensions revealed a nuanced picture. The item "excessive idol worship leads to distortion of personal values" received the highest mean score of 3.99, indicating relatively strong agreement and suggesting that even students who personally experience worship positively remain aware of its potential risks when taken to excess. By contrast, the items "idol worship helps students relieve stress and provides emotional comfort" (mean = 2.83) and "idol worship helps students learn new skills such as video editing and drawing" (mean = 2.78) received moderate scores, reflecting a cautious acknowledgment of potential benefits. The item "idol worship takes up a large amount of students' study and rest time" received the lowest mean score of 2.46, indicating that most students do not perceive worship as a significant time burden.
It is notable that these Likert items were framed from a bystander perspective—asking respondents about idol worship's impact on students in general rather than on themselves personally. The discrepancy between the positive self-reported overall impact (42.64% positive) and the relatively high concern about values distortion (mean = 3.99) suggests that students tend to evaluate their own worship experience more favorably than they evaluate the phenomenon in the abstract, a pattern consistent with optimistic self-assessment biases documented in social psychology.
4.3 RQ3: Perceived Impact on the Online Environment¶
A pronounced private–public paradox emerged when comparing students' personal worship experiences with their evaluations of fan culture's impact on the online environment.
Among respondents with idols (n = 129), 60 (46.51%) described fan-circle conflicts as "seriously damaging—full of hostility and malice," and an additional 31 (24.03%) rated the impact as "somewhat negative—but moderate in degree." Thus, over 70% of idol-worshipping respondents themselves evaluated fan culture conflicts as harmful to the online environment. Only 21 (16.28%) expressed indifference, 12 (9.30%) considered the conflicts neutral, and 5 (3.88%) perceived them as positive.
Among respondents without idols (n = 64), a similarly negative pattern was observed, though slightly less intense: 24 (37.50%) selected "seriously damaging," 22 (34.38%) selected "somewhat negative," 11 (17.19%) expressed indifference, 5 (7.81%) considered the conflicts neutral, and 2 (3.13%) perceived them as positive. In total, 71.88% of non-idol respondents evaluated the impact as negative.
The convergence between the two groups is striking: both idol-worshipping and non-idol respondents overwhelmingly perceived fan culture conflicts as damaging to the online environment. However, the idol-worshipping group showed an even higher proportion selecting the most extreme negative category (46.51% vs. 37.50%), suggesting that direct familiarity with fan culture may heighten rather than diminish awareness of its destructive collective dynamics.
This finding stands in sharp contrast to the personal impact data reported in Section 4.2, where 90.70% of idol-worshipping respondents perceived their personal worship experience as positive or neutral. The tension between positive personal experience and negative public evaluation constitutes the central empirical paradox of this study.
4.4 Supplementary Findings: Fan Circle Participation and Conflict Behavior¶
To provide additional context for interpreting the above findings, the survey also assessed fan circle participation behaviors and conflict involvement.
Among respondents with idols, only 34 (26.36%) confirmed participation in organized fan-circle activities, with an additional 14 (10.85%) indicating probable participation. Among those who had participated (n = 59), the most common activities were purchasing idol merchandise (77.97%), participating in online discussions (61.02%), attending offline events (37.29%), voting and chart ranking (32.20%), and creating promotional content (30.51%).
Regarding conflict behavior, 19 respondents (14.73%) acknowledged participation in idol/fan-circle conflict-related behavior, while 99 (76.74%) denied such participation and 11 (8.53%) preferred not to say. Among those who acknowledged conflict participation (n = 19), the most common forms were arguing in comment sections or private messages (63.16%), reposting or spreading content to support one's side (31.58%), posting complaints about opposing idols or fans (26.32%), and participating in organized counter-attacks or comment flooding (21.05%).
These supplementary findings suggest that while the majority of idol-worshipping students engage with their idols through personal media consumption rather than organized collective action, a significant minority does participate in the organized dynamics that both groups perceive as harmful to the online environment.
5. Discussion¶
5.1 Cognitive-Aspirational Dominance and Higher-Order Needs¶
The most striking finding of this study is the overwhelming dominance of cognitive-aspirational motivations. With talent recognition endorsed by 89.92% and values identification by 82.95% of respondents with idols, the motivational landscape is clearly anchored in admiration for competence and character rather than in emotional dependence, social pressure, or escapism. This pattern aligns with Maslow's hierarchy of needs at the levels of esteem and self-actualization: students appear to engage with idols as aspirational models who embody qualities they themselves value and wish to cultivate. The relatively low endorsement of escapism (9.30%) and social-belonging needs (11.63%) challenges the assumption, prevalent in both popular discourse and some academic literature, that idol worship is primarily a compensatory behavior driven by psychological deficiency.
This finding complements Wei and Huang's (2024) identification of six distinct fan profiles among Chinese emerging adults. While their latent profile analysis revealed heterogeneity in fan engagement, the present study's motivation-centered approach demonstrates that across this heterogeneity, cognitive-aspirational drivers remain the common foundation. The result is also consistent with Morgan et al.'s (2024) qualitative finding that celebrity worship can inspire personal growth alongside its potential to exacerbate anxiety—our data suggest that the growth-inspiring dimension is far more prevalent in this sample than the anxiety-exacerbating one.
5.2 The Private–Public Paradox¶
The second major finding is the sharp disconnect between students' evaluations of their personal worship experience and their evaluations of fan culture's collective impact on the online environment. While 90.70% of idol-worshipping respondents described their personal experience as positive or neutral, over 70% of the same group characterized fan-circle conflicts as damaging to the online environment, with 46.51% selecting the most extreme negative category. This private–public paradox is the central empirical contribution of this study.
The paradox indicates that the transition from individual admiration to organized fan participation introduces qualitatively different risks. Mao et al. (2023) offer a useful framework for understanding this transition: they characterized Chinese fan circles as "quasi-organizational communities" governed by emotional discipline and commercial logic. Within these structures, individual attachment is channeled into collective actions such as chart-ranking campaigns, coordinated comment flooding, and consumption-based loyalty tests. Zhang (2024) traced how 30 years of online fandom evolution in China have progressively strengthened these organizational capacities, turning casual fan groups into highly mobilized communities capable of large-scale coordinated action. The present study's finding that even the students who personally benefit from idol worship recognize its collective destructiveness supports this structural interpretation: the problem is not individual admiration but the organizational systems that transform it into collective conflict.
The Likert-scale results further illuminate this tension. Students' relatively strong agreement with the statement that excessive idol worship leads to distortion of personal values (mean = 3.99) coexists with their predominantly positive self-assessment of personal impact. This discrepancy may reflect an optimistic self-assessment bias—the tendency to evaluate one's own situation more favorably than the general case—but it may also indicate genuine differentiation: students may accurately perceive that their own moderate engagement is beneficial while recognizing that the organized dynamics of fan culture produce harmful outcomes at the collective level.
5.3 Individual Worship Versus Organized Fan Culture¶
Idol worship among university students is frequently discussed as though it were a single, inherently harmful behavior. Critics point to excessive consumption, wasted time, and emotional dependence, treating anyone who admires a celebrity as a potential victim of psychological damage. However, this view oversimplifies a complex phenomenon. Drawing on both existing scholarship and original survey data collected from 193 Chinese university students, the evidence from this study argues that idol worship itself is not the primary threat to students' well-being. Rather, the real danger lies in the organized, collective dynamics of fan culture—the systems of group pressure, commercial manipulation, and online conflict that transform a largely positive personal experience into a socially destructive force.
First, the evidence suggests that individual idol worship is, for most students, a neutral or even beneficial activity. Our survey data show that 42.6% of respondents reported a positive effect of idol worship on university life, 48.1% reported no significant effect, and only 5.4% perceived a negative impact. The dominant motivations are cognitive and aspirational: 89.9% cited talent recognition as a primary reason, and 83.0% identified with the idol's personality or values. By contrast, escapism was selected by only 9.3%, and social needs by just 11.6%. These figures challenge the assumption that idol worship is driven by emotional dependence. Instead, most students engage in worship as aspirational identification, aligning with Maslow's hierarchy at the levels of esteem and self-actualization. This interpretation is supported by Morgan et al. (2024), whose qualitative study documented dual effects of celebrity worship, finding it could both inspire personal growth and exacerbate anxiety. Qu and Zhong (2025) also demonstrated a positive pathway, showing that idol worship among Chinese fans could promote prosocial behavior through parasocial intimacy and perceived social support. The individual experience of admiring an idol is not inherently harmful—it can function as an emotional resource.
However, the picture changes dramatically when we shift from the individual to the collective level. Our data uncover a striking paradox: while most students view their personal worship positively, they hold deeply negative views about fan culture's impact on the online environment. Specifically, 46.5% of respondents with idols described fan-circle conflicts as "seriously damaging, full of hostility and malice," and an additional 24.0% rated the impact as "somewhat negative." Over 70% of idol-worshipping students themselves recognize that collective fan behavior harms public online spaces. This private–public paradox is crucial. It indicates that the transition from individual admiration to organized fan participation introduces qualitatively different risks. Mao et al. (2023) offer a useful framework: they characterize Chinese fan circles as "quasi-organizational communities" relying on emotional discipline and commercial logic. Within these structures, individual attachment is channeled into collective actions such as chart-ranking campaigns, coordinated comment flooding, and consumption-based loyalty tests. Zhang (2024) traced how 30 years of online fandom evolution in China have progressively strengthened these organizational capacities, turning casual fan groups into highly mobilized communities capable of large-scale coordinated action.
Some might argue that individual and collective worship cannot be meaningfully separated—that once a person admires an idol, they inevitably become drawn into fan culture's organized dynamics. While there is some truth to this concern, our data suggest otherwise. Among respondents who reported having an idol, only 26.4% had participated in organized fan-circle activities such as voting or purchasing merchandise. The remaining majority engaged with their idols through personal media consumption without active collective participation. This finding is consistent with Wei and Huang (2024), who identified six distinct fan profiles among Chinese emerging adults, demonstrating that fan engagement exists along a spectrum rather than as a binary. Moreover, Zhang et al. (2026) used network analysis to show that it is specifically borderline-pathological worship cognition—not moderate admiration—that serves as the key bridge connecting celebrity worship to reduced life satisfaction. In other words, there is a clear threshold between healthy individual engagement and the kind of excessive, group-driven involvement that causes harm.
5.4 Connections to Prior Research¶
The present findings resonate with and extend several key contributions in the literature. McCutcheon et al.'s (2002) three-stage model (entertainment-social, intense-personal, borderline-pathological) implies that most worship occurs at the milder end of the continuum. Our motivational data support this implication: the dominance of cognitive-aspirational motivations and the low endorsement of escapism and emotional dependence suggest that the majority of worship in our sample corresponds to the entertainment-social stage, characterized by curiosity, admiration, and voluntary engagement rather than compulsion or distress.
The finding that personal impact perceptions are predominantly positive is consistent with Qu and Zhong's (2025) demonstration of a positive pathway from idol worship to prosocial behavior, mediated by parasocial intimacy and perceived social support. It also aligns with Gong et al.'s (2025) observation that celebrity worship naturally declines during the university transition for securely attached students, suggesting that for most students, idol worship is a developmental phase rather than a persistent pathology.
At the same time, our finding that students themselves recognize fan culture's destructive collective impact is consistent with Zhang et al.'s (2026) network analysis showing that borderline-pathological worship cognition serves as the bridge to reduced life satisfaction. The implication is that the boundary between beneficial and harmful worship is real and perceptible to students themselves—even if they do not always recognize when they are crossing it. Wang and Ge's (2023) analysis of fan conflicts and state power in China further contextualizes our finding: the organized dynamics that students perceive as harmful do not arise spontaneously from individual admiration but are shaped by platform architectures, commercial incentives, and the political environment.
5.5 Limitations and Future Research¶
Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the sample size (N = 193) limits generalizability. Second, all measures were self-reported and therefore susceptible to social desirability bias, particularly regarding conflict participation and negative impact acknowledgment. Third, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference; we can identify associations between motivational profiles and perceived impacts but cannot determine directionality. Fourth, the use of descriptive statistics without inferential testing limits the strength of conclusions that can be drawn about group differences. Fifth, the motivational categories were derived inductively from survey items rather than from a validated scale, which may affect construct validity.
Future research should address these limitations through larger and more representative samples, longitudinal designs that can track how motivations and perceptions change over time, validated motivational scales adapted to the Chinese context, and mixed-methods approaches that combine survey data with qualitative interviews to capture the complexity of students' lived experiences. Additionally, experimental or quasi-experimental designs could help isolate the specific mechanisms through which organized fan culture dynamics transform individual admiration into collective harm.
6. Conclusion¶
This study set out to investigate the psychological motivations driving idol worship among Chinese university students and how these motivations relate to perceived impacts at both personal and social levels. Three key findings emerged.
First, cognitive-aspirational motivations—particularly talent recognition and personality/values identification—dominate the motivational landscape of idol worship among Chinese university students, with talent and character recognition far exceeding emotional dependence or social needs as primary drivers. This finding challenges the prevailing narrative that idol worship is primarily driven by psychological deficiency and supports an interpretation grounded in Maslow's higher-order needs for esteem and self-actualization.
Second, the perceived personal impact of idol worship is largely positive or neutral. The overwhelming majority of students who have idols view their engagement as personally beneficial or inconsequential, suggesting that moderate idol worship can serve as an emotional and aspirational resource rather than a threat to well-being.
Third, a significant private–public paradox exists: while students view their personal worship experience positively, they simultaneously acknowledge that fan culture conflicts are damaging to the online environment. This paradox points to a critical distinction between individual idol worship and organized fan culture. The evidence from this study, supported by the broader literature, consistently indicates that the genuine risks emerge not from individual admiration but from the collective, organized dynamics of fan culture—the systems of emotional discipline, commercial exploitation, and coordinated conflict that transform a largely positive personal experience into a socially destructive force.
In conclusion, treating idol worship as a monolithic threat to university students is both inaccurate and counterproductive. Educational and policy responses should focus not on discouraging idol worship itself, but on equipping students with the media literacy and critical thinking skills needed to recognize when individual admiration is being co-opted by collective dynamics that no longer serve their interests. The data from this study suggest that students themselves already perceive this distinction—the task for educators is to help them act on it.
References¶
Brooks, S. K. (2021). FANatics: Systematic literature review of factors associated with celebrity worship, and suggested directions for future research. Current Psychology, 40, 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9978-4
Gong, X., Lin, S., Ding, F., Zhao, W., Hu, X., Wang, D., & Cheng, G. (2025). The effect of attachment on the trajectory of celebrity worship: The mediating role of self-concept clarity. Personality and Individual Differences, 237, 113169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113169
He, Y., & Liu, Q. (2024). The excessive celebrity worship behavior questionnaire: Chinese scale development and validation. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0303683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303683
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Jia, R., Yang, Q., Liu, B., Song, H., & Wang, Z. (2023). Social anxiety and celebrity worship: The mediating effects of mobile phone dependence and moderating effects of family socioeconomic status. BMC Psychology, 11, 364. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01405-x
MacNeill, A. L., & DiTommaso, E. (2022). An attachment perspective on favorite media figures. Psychological Reports, 125(3), 1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211002142
Maltby, J., Day, L., McCutcheon, L. E., Gillett, R., Houran, J., & Ashe, D. D. (2004). Personality and coping: A context for examining celebrity worship and mental health. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369794
Mao, D., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2023). Observations of Chinese fandom: Organizational characteristics and the relationships inside and outside the "fan circle." The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00197-2
McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162454
Morgan, A. K., Katey, D., Wadei, B., Forkuor, D., & Peprah, C. (2024). Celebrity worship: Friend or foe of mental health? Qualitative evidence from Ghanaian adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), 2371396. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2371396
Qu, F., & Zhong, L. (2025). Is idol worship good or bad? A chain mediation model connecting anxious attachment and prosocial behavior tendency among Chinese fans. Acta Psychologica, 261, 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105935
Wang, E. N., & Ge, L. (2023). Fan conflicts and state power in China: Internalised heteronormativity, censorship sensibilities, and fandom police. Asian Studies Review, 47(2), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2022.2112655
Wei, D., & Huang, Y.-T. (2024). Unraveling complexity of celebrity worship and its associations with mental health among emerging adults in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1721. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04296-4
Zhang, K., Jia, R., Dong, S., Yang, J., Yang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2026). Mapping the links between celebrity worship and subjective well-being in Chinese undergraduates via network analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010028
Zhang, W. (2024). The 30 years of China's online fandom. Communication and the Public, 9(4), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473241270576